The fatal ignorance of Tibet

Regarding the border dispute between India and China. There is a lot of discussion going on. India's relationship with China is never going very well. Sometimes it is at peace and sometimes there is turbulence. 1962, 1967 are the years of war and 1996 and 2017 are years of wrangling and tension. Not sure what 2020 is, but India has been cheated.

Why the old history of war and tension with China was not seen as a conflict of culture is awe-inspiring. Till 1959, there was no border between India and China. After occupying Tibet, China started eyeing India. The assimilation of Tibet into China was dangerous for India. Everyone hostile to India, from Genghis Khan to Chinfing, belongs to the Yuhan caste. Those who occupy Tibet also consider Ladakh as small Tibet. In his view, Arunachal Pradesh is a part of southern Tibet. It needs to be understood that the entire Indian region of the Himalayas, including Ladakh, Arunachal, has a deep cultural, religious and ethnic relationship with Tibet.

The political ideas that accepted the concept of a country and a people with the diversity of India's cultural nationality, did not allow the Indian sentiment to develop in its cultural features. Do not associate the question of Tibet with India, it is not only the nature of politics, all social science and humanities are equally guilty. Except for some leaders like Lohia and Deendayal, Tibet was not important for anyone with the idea of ​​protecting India's sovereignty and the border. After the defeat of 1962, Tibet's independence was also important when the whole of Ladakh, Arunachal, Sikkim, ie the entire Himalayan territory of India was fighting with China. Because the Tibetan Vajrayana tradition has a common connection with all these areas.

This Vajrayana tradition has no relation with Chinese Buddhism. It is a spread of the knowledge tradition of Nalanda. The existence of Tibet is a guarantee of India's security and protection of India's cultural splendor. Tibet is not a small plot, It is one third of today's China. Until 1959 remained an independent sovereign nation. As this stereotype, it is part of the oldest religious tradition in India. After all, here only Kailash and Mansarovar are absent from literature? World peace is also a guarantee of Tibet as a neutral state between two large and strategically equipped nations like India and China. The intellectual of India will fulfill its responsibility by spreading the discussion of Tibet globally and not only help the Tibetans wandering around, but will also fulfill the national duties by erecting a self-respecting society with cultural understanding on the borders of India today. With a mentality, claiming Arunachal, clawing towards Ladakh, preparing chicken-neck cuts, the millennium-old sense of cultural unity must be awakened. Indians will have to prove that Tibet's independence is inevitable.

The Tibetan people have the right to live and govern independent autonomous Tibet. What is the reason that all the forces of the world over a small territory like Hong Kong stands together, but the question of a vast land like Tibet remains silent? Today, Britain has created the form of Hong Kong. Since Britain has an emotional connection with Hong Kong, any attack on it is considered to be a blow to other countries including Britain, but the culture, religion and life tradition in Tibet is an extension of Indian culture, religion and life tradition. Therefore Europe will not come with him. The entire western world has neither an economic interest nor a cultural connection with Tibet. The absence of Tibet does not even matter on its geographical location. India will have to fight the struggle of Tibet. Long preparation is required for this.

Today, even the present generation of teachers and politicians do not know the reality of Tibet. We did not keep Tibet alive even in our memories. What do we know about Tibetans more than the nomadic race selling hot clothes in winter in the Tibetan market? I do not know why I am not sensitive. Will know, understand, then it will come to mind that these are the people who once had Kailash Mansarovar, the area of ​​gods and Gandhavas was Trishishtap. Tibetans are a part and patron of India's cultural splendor.

Therefore, India has to intensify the diplomacy of its cultural tradition. The common Indian should know that in the war of 1962, a follower of the Tibetan creed should not go to Ladakh, for which Jai Hind was fighting with the slogan. This pride story should be told to every Indian.

It will have to be archived and publicized. If we have done this then we will prove to be an Indian to create a favorable environment in the war zone for the Indian Army. The responsibility of the conscious people of this generation of intellectual society is increasing. They should produce Tibet-centric narratives. From this, the path of permanent solution will be found, the pride of humanity will be sung and India's self-respect will grow.

TIBET: Why does CHINA want to KEEP IT so BADLY?