What After Kashmir and Ayodhya?

What happened in Ayodhya and Kashmir and what is going to happen was unthinkable. The beginning of the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya and the departure of Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir a year ago is not as smooth.

The reaction of the people on both these issues shows that the people of the country were ready for it, waiting, yet in the mind was that it is probably a never-ending wait. The foundation of the Ayodhya movement is the sacrifice of Rama devotees, then Guru Tegh Bahadur, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, and millions of Hindus in Kashmir. Ayodhya and Kashmir boast a long story of sacrifice and sacrifices to protect India's culture and cultural heritage.

The verdict of Ayodhya came from the Supreme Court. Kashmir was decided by the strong political will of Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. Handling the situation after Article 370 was more difficult than it was difficult to remove. Whose politics, livelihood, and power of generations was associated with this article was not easy to neutralize. All these forts standing based on 370 were destroyed. The people of Jammu and Kashmir accepted this change, this is evidenced by Omar Abdullah's statement that now we have to think afresh about what will be the basis of our politics. Why could not the people or government do the work that Modi and Shah could do? It is necessary to explain it because only after this, 3 will understand what they are going to do, what can they do? It is not that these tasks were difficult at first and now easy.

There are two reasons for this. First, both of them refused to follow the rut. Secondly, the belief in ourselves that what they are doing is doing in the national interest and the people of the country trust us. Every big dream starts with a dreamer. Without karma, every hypothesis becomes a mere dream. The quality of leadership is the art of forward-thinking. The question is what after the removal of Article 370 and constructions of Ram temple? There is a general perception that Modi has a habit of shocking. He doesn't seem to wind up his next move. If not sure, then ask Omar Abdullah and Fasya Abdullah. Both met the Prime Minister three days before August 5, 2019, and were happy that nothing was going to happen even on the morning of the fifth date when the person to whom and the time they wanted to know was told at the same time. Why? Those who have read Chanakya can easily understand. Chanakya has written that the king (ruler) should be like a turtle. For example, when necessary, it removes the organ. Similarly, the king should tell as much as necessary. The question is then what is next? No one knows the answer. It has been only 14 months since the second term of the Modi government and Lord Rama's nearly five hundred years of exile had ended, the shackles of Article 370 were broken. This work was done by the BJP government which agreed to give up both these issues for power. Just look at the major issues of BJP and Sangh. Do not forget Kashi and Mathura while talking about such issues. Cultural nationalism is at the core of all these issues. Such issues will continue to come and work will be done on them. There are three more to come in this term of Modi.

It is a strange coincidence that then-President Rajendra Prasad was involved in the program of Pran Pratishtha in Somnath Temple and Prime Minister Modi in Bhumi Pujan of Ram Temple. Rajesh Babu went to Somnath despite Nehru's opposition. Nehru saw it as a Hindu renaissance. Today the people of the same Congress are unable to hear the call of future steps. The speech that Rajendra Prasad gave after Pran Pratishtha at Somnath Temple was printed in all newspapers the other day, but Nehru, the great democratic and pioneer of freedom of expression, ensured that the censor was done through the government.

The Modi government decided that the program of the Ram Mandir should be broadcast through Doordarshan, the official communication medium. Stop Modi's horse of Ashwamedha at this time no one is there. The alternative to Hindu protest politics is over. Veer Savarkar had said that the tendency to consider India as fatherland and a virtuous land is a symptom of Hindutva. After the enactment of the law against triple talaq, the removal of Article 370 and now the Ram temple in Ayodhya, what next? Both BJP supporters and opponents are asking this question. This work is not the goal of the BJP Modi government and Sangh Parivar.

These are milestones along the way to the goal. The construction of the Ram temple is a festival to restore India's dignity. It is said that religion is protected in two ways, from scripture and arms, but this phase shows that religion is also protected from the faith of its followers. For 492 years, the faith of Ram devotees remained steadfast.

The grand Ram temple in Ayodhya is a reflection of that faith. On the occasion of the renovation of Somnath temple, Rajendra Prasad had said - Great power is built by demolition. The whole world is witnessing this power of construction in Ayodhya.